Due Diligence

Reputed developer ≠ automatically safe project

A developer's history and a specific project's record are two separate questions. We examine both, and we separate what is documented from what is merely claimed.

All figures shown on this page belong to a demonstration record. No real developer or project is scored publicly on this website.

Due-Diligence Framework

Ten categories of evidence, examined separately

Every category is gathered from primary sources first. The completeness figures below belong to a demonstration record — they are not ratings of any real developer or project.

Sample Evaluation
82

Developer Track Record

Tier 1

Entity history, years active, segments delivered and continuity of operations.

74

Delivery Performance

Tier 2

Committed versus actual handover behaviour across earlier projects.

91

MahaRERA Verification

Tier 1

Registration validity, declared timelines, quarterly progress updates and complaints.

68

Legal & Litigation

Tier 1

Court, tribunal and NCLT searches against the entity and the specific project.

77

Land Title

Tier 1

Ownership chain, encumbrance position and development rights documentation.

85

Government Approvals

Tier 1

Sanctioned plans, layout approvals, environment and civic clearances.

63

Bank / Financial Validation

Tier 2

Lender acceptance, project funding structure and escrow discipline signals.

58

Completion & Possession

Tier 1

Construction stage evidence, completion certificates and possession readiness.

71

Customer Verification

Tier 2

References from existing homeowners and independently verifiable experiences.

69

Investment Risk Score

Tier 1

Consolidated view of legal, delivery, liquidity and concentration risk.

Scores below indicate how complete the evidence gathering is for each category in this demonstration record. They are not ratings of any real developer or project.

Evidence Hierarchy

Marketing claims are not proof

Not every source carries the same weight. We build a view from primary records upward, and never let promotional material stand in for verification.

Tier 1

Primary / Government Sources

Highest confidence

  • MahaRERA
  • Government Records
  • Local Authorities
  • MCA
  • Courts / NCLT

Tier 2

Independent Sources

Corroborating

  • Reputable News
  • Independent Property Databases
  • Existing Homeowner References

Tier 3

Low-Confidence Sources

Never sufficient alone

  • Developer Marketing
  • Broker Claims
  • Social Media Claims
  • Unverified Reviews

Investment Decision Framework

Ten checkpoints between interest and commitment

Every engagement moves through the same sequence. Select a step to see what is examined.

Step 01

Location

Corridor fundamentals, access, civic infrastructure, employment proximity and the direction of planned development.

Consultation

Have a project you want verified?

Share the project and developer. We will tell you what the records show and what remains unverifiable.